This collection of articles reflects the evolution of Business Improvement Districts from their early days in the United States when they were typically formed in large urban centers whose stakeholders were sufficiently concerned about the effect of “crime and grime” on their businesses and property values that they were willing to share the costs of remedial measures. Although BID experience in Canada had preceded the first American examples, the early ventures in the US were launched with little guidance. Earlier urban renewal programs were thought to have made things worse and Chambers of Commerce and merchant associations were toothless talk shops without useful resources. Voluntary activities, here and in Great Britain, produced little money and a significant group of freeloaders.
The elements remain simple: an organization representing diverse economic interests plans and manages a budget based on a compulsory charge adopted by local government. The investments are intended to advance business profitability and property values.
BIDs have generally been successful at:
- Creating a favorable identity appealing to customers, visitors and investors;
- Upgrading the appearance through improved lighting, landscaping, façade improvements on commercial properties;
- Generating activity.
They have not, however, been universally successful.
- Many lack clear economic goals, opening their treasuries to unessential claims;
- Boards of Directors often fail to reconsider program emphases that may have become obsolete;
- Few BIDs extend their influence beyond basic safe-clean-marketing when their commercial centers require leadership, expertise and some funding for redevelopment, planning and strategic property investments;
- Having demonstrated that commercial areas are more valuable because of BID initiatives, few if any have negotiated transfers of responsibilities to general purpose governments;
- After about ten years of favorable media treatment, BIDs rend to rest on their laurels. Repeating last year’s activities are easy choices because there is little tension in these decisions.
Chapter 1: Partnering Local Governments and Businesses
Chapter 2: Capitalist Tool
Chapter 3: Betting on BIDs
Chapter 4: Are BIDs Working?
Chapter 5: BIDs Come to Britain
Chapter 6: BIDs at Home and Abroad
Chapter 7: Gotham Gets Civil
Chapter 8: BIDs Growing Pains
Chapter 9: Smart Money
Chapter 10: The Future of BIDs: Smaller and More Creative
Chapter 11: Voluntary BIDs Lack Equity, Reliability
Chapter 12: “Creative” Investments Will Be Key to Long-Term BID Success
Chapter 13: BIDs and Main Street
Chapter 14: Future of BIDs…Partnerships
Chapter 15: BIDs and Urban Entertainment Zones
Chapter 16: True Grit
Chapter 17: BID Book Promos
Chapter 18: The Attraction of Arts
Chapter 19: BIDs: Encompassing Residential As Well As Commercial Properties
Chapter 20: Every Five Years, a Fresh Start
Chapter 21: BIDs and the Shape of American Cities
Chapter 22: Face Time is Key to Successful BID Start-Up
Chapter 23: Downtowns and BIDs can do more…
Chapter 24: What We Don’t Know Drexel
Chapter 25: Lost Lessons from American BIDs
Chapter 26: BIDs Face the Recession
Chapter 27: Too Much Cleaning?
Chapter 28: King of Prussia BID Approved
Chapter 29: BID Success: Are We Happy Yet?
Chapter 3o: Urban Awakening
Chapter 31: Do BIDs Reduce Crime or Fear?
Chapter 32: Crime and Fear: Yesterday’s Problems?
Chapter 33: Where We Are and Where We Are Going: Ten Clues for Planners
Chapter 34: Viewpoint: $20 Gas
Chapter 35: When Business Buys Transit
Chapter 36: Car Sharing
Chapter 37: Living in the Center: What Explains the Downtown Housing Boom?
Chapter 38: Neighborhood Improvement District Explored for University City
Chapter 39: BIDs: Partnering for Economic Development
Chapter 40: Economic Development (book review)
Chapter 41: Small Downtown-Affordable Solutions to an Expensive Problem, the Fear of Crime
Chapter 42: Innovations: Not Your Usual BIDs
Chapter 43: Business Improvement Districts Reconsidered